What do you think of Kemi Badenoch's statement that maternity pay is "excessive"?

 

Kemi Badenoch's claim that motherhood was "excessive" sparked controversy. In an interview, she said that the level of government support through forced motherhood had gone too far, adding that the system of redistributing tax revenues had placed a burden on companies. Badenoch advocated greater personal responsibility and less state intervention in areas such as motherhood, citing historical periods when people had more children without such financial support. This view is consistent with his broader political philosophy of reducing regulation and government involvement in certain sectors. However, Badenoch's comments have been criticised from many quarters. Critics, such as Joel Brierley of the advocacy group Pregnancy Then Catch, argue that forced motherhood is necessary to ensure family happiness, allowing women the time they need after pregnancy and childbirth without forcing them to return to work too early. Opponents also point out that maternity leave has tangible benefits for infant mortality and women’s health. Badenoch later clarified her position, saying she believes in maternity pay but is mainly concerned about the regulatory burden on businesses. He stressed the need to find a balance between supporting families and maintaining a flexible and business-friendly environment.